Beauty and the Beast 3D: An Investment or a Scam

It's hard to find a new movie that ISN'T playing in 3D these days. In fact it's become such a popular money-maker that I'm surprised movies still advertise the 3D instead of just assuming that people know (this will happen soon enough). Anyways, ever since the release of "Avatar" back in 2009, the third dimension has taken over the film industry. But this year a new strategy is beginning to take it's course...3D re-releases. With such films as "Star Wars," "Titanic," and "Finding Nemo" being re-released on the silver screen later this year (in that order), the time has come to ask the question, "Are seeing these old films in 3D really worth the money?"

This weekend showcased the opening of the first 3D re-release of 2012, Disney's "Beauty and the Beast." Was I willing to pay the extra cash to see a film that I could simply watch at home? Of course! Why? For starters it's my favorite animated Disney film and I never had the privilege of seeing it on the big screen. This is the best quality of these upcoming re-releases, it allows people to experience a film they love in a way they have never experienced it before...at a movie theater. This alone is worth the money; but in case you aren't convinced, "Beauty and the Beast"
boasts digitally restored visuals, providing a more colorful, descriptive, and high-quality picture. The sound is also restored and when played on the powerful movie theater speakers, it's hard not to sing along.

Now if you didn't like the movie when it first came out, this will obviously be a waste of money. The filmmakers didn't add anything new (story-wise) to make the film different. In fact they actually removed the new song that was placed in the recent Blu-Ray/DVD release, making this movie exactly as it was when it was first released (except for a few minor visual changes). Also, if you describe your attitude towards the film as "Alright" "Worth the nine bucks" or any other mediocre term...RED FLAG! Only pay to see these re-released films if you absolutely love it, otherwise it will be a waste of money.

So it's simple, if you loved the film the first time then see it again, especially if you never saw it at the theater. "Beauty and the Beast" was the same magical masterpiece that it was when I first saw it, and in 3D I got to experience it all on a whole new level. I eagerly anticipate the upcoming re-releases that 2012 is bringing our way (STAR WARS!) and will gladly pay to see some of the most famous works of Hollywood in the third dimension.

War Horse

With films like "Saving Private Ryan" and "Schindler's List" on his filmography, it's no question that director Steven Spielberg is a master of the "war" genre (and every other genre for that matter). This being the case, I could not wait for his new World War 1 epic "War Horse" to be released on Christmas day. With my high expectations and Christmas spirit I walked into the theater ready to be impressed. Hello Academy Awards, let me introduce you to the film that deserves to sweep the prizes this year.

"War Horse" is the tale of a horse, obviously, who impacts several English, French, and German families and individuals during the course of World War 1. The start of the tale begins with the young horse, named Joey, being sold to Albert Narracott's (Jeremy Irvine) family. Albert raises Joey and trains him to plough so that his father will make enough money to keep their house. Against all odds, Albert and Joey succeed in ploughing the farm. Sadly, this joy is quickly diminished when Albert's father is forced to sell Joey to a captain in the English army (Tom Hiddleston) in order to make ends meet. From here Joey travels through the course of the war, passing from the English army, to the Germans, and to several other places. At the same time Albert keeps faith that he will be united with his closest companion before the dangers of war can affect either of them.

The grand thing about "War Horse" is that it showcases what Spielberg does best, telling a great story. The movie doesn't try to cram special effect laden action sequences or unrealistic heroic feats into the plot line. Instead it focuses on what is important, the heart and soul of the film...the story. And the story connects to the viewer. It drew me in, made me care about the characters and the horse, and stirred my emotions in scenes of both sorrow and happiness.

And for those who can be squeamish to graphic violence scenes prevalent in most war films, don't worry. This PG-13 rated epic stays far from the intensity seen in "Saving Private Ryan." That's not to say the the battle scenes are any less impressive. Each conflict is beautifully shot and visually captivating. The film as a whole includes beautiful landscapes and set pieces that fully immerse the viewer in WWI Europe.

And the music is a grand addition as well. John Williams, who has composed some of the most famous movie themes of all time (Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Indiana Jones, etc) is back with his usual collaborator (Spielberg) and has created another beautiful score. Williams bring a stunning, classical sound to "War Horse" that lives up to his reputation.

Spielberg has done it again. Another instant classic has been brought to the silver screen and thanks to the brilliant acting, cinematography, and captivating story, "War Horse" is the best film of the year. I give it four stars out of four.

"War Horse" has a running time of two hours and twenty-six minutes and is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of war violence.